Trackersoftwarereview-mtg8 » History » Version 4
Rogers, Chris, 01 November 2017 14:08
1 | 1 | Rajaram, Durga | h1. Tracker Software Review: Meeting 8 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | h2. November 1, 2017: 1400 GMT |
||
4 | |||
5 | h2. Agenda |
||
6 | |||
7 | 1. *Actions from previous meetings* |
||
8 | * *PR*: |
||
9 | ### AD: Optimize Chi2 cut for “MINUIT” variant |
||
10 | ### AD, CH: Check and implement MCS errors |
||
11 | ### AD, KL: Define multi-track requirements |
||
12 | * *Track fit*: |
||
13 | ### Investigate whether field integration (e.g. using Runge Kutta) is required to compensate for magnetic field non-uniformity |
||
14 | ### Make study of magnetic-field alignment with a view to establishing whether the present algorithm is sufficiently insensitive to reasonable assumptions of maximum field-misalignment |
||
15 | ### Study p-value: split up contributions to p-value shape using MC and study shape in data, e.g. is there an error in the resolution per plane, handling of MCS, handing of energy loss, b field.. |
||
16 | |||
17 | 2. *Recent issues*: |
||
18 | ## 50 MeV bump -- more pronounced with MINUIT? |
||
19 | 3 | Rajaram, Durga | ## CR reports lower downstream efficiency, and fewer events in analysis when using MINUIT -- should MINUIT continue to be the default fitter in MAUS? |
20 | 4 | Rogers, Chris | ### [[analysis:2017-10-21_lsq]] |
21 | 1 | Rajaram, Durga | |
22 | 3. *PR Report*: A. Dobbs |
||
23 | 4. *Track fit Report*: C. Hunt |
||
24 | |||
25 | 5. *Next Steps for review* |
||
26 | 6. *AoB* |
||
27 | |||
28 | --- |
||
29 | |||
30 | h2. Dial-in information |
||
31 | |||
32 | http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html |
||
33 | |||
34 | --- |