Trackersoftwarereview-mtg8 » History » Version 2
Rajaram, Durga, 31 October 2017 10:29
1 | 1 | Rajaram, Durga | h1. Tracker Software Review: Meeting 8 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | h2. November 1, 2017: 1400 GMT |
||
4 | |||
5 | h2. Agenda |
||
6 | |||
7 | 1. *Actions from previous meetings* |
||
8 | * *PR*: |
||
9 | ### AD: Optimize Chi2 cut for “MINUIT” variant |
||
10 | ### AD, CH: Check and implement MCS errors |
||
11 | ### AD, KL: Define multi-track requirements |
||
12 | * *Track fit*: |
||
13 | ### Investigate whether field integration (e.g. using Runge Kutta) is required to compensate for magnetic field non-uniformity |
||
14 | ### Make study of magnetic-field alignment with a view to establishing whether the present algorithm is sufficiently insensitive to reasonable assumptions of maximum field-misalignment |
||
15 | ### Study p-value: split up contributions to p-value shape using MC and study shape in data, e.g. is there an error in the resolution per plane, handling of MCS, handing of energy loss, b field.. |
||
16 | |||
17 | 2. *Recent issues*: |
||
18 | ## 50 MeV bump -- more pronounced with MINUIT? |
||
19 | ## CR reports lower downstream efficiency, and fewer events in analysis when using MINUIT. Should MINUIT continue to be the default fitter in MAUS? |
||
20 | |||
21 | 3. *PR Report*: A. Dobbs |
||
22 | 4. *Track fit Report*: C. Hunt |
||
23 | |||
24 | 5. *Next Steps for review* |
||
25 | 6. *AoB* |
||
26 | |||
27 | --- |
||
28 | |||
29 | h2. Dial-in information |
||
30 | |||
31 | http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html |
||
32 | |||
33 | --- |