FF 20130409 » History » Version 4
Rogers, Chris, 07 January 2015 17:22
1 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | h1. FF 20130409 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | Present: |
||
4 | |||
5 | * Chris Rogers |
||
6 | * Henry Nebrensky |
||
7 | * John Palin |
||
8 | |||
9 | During visit to MICE hall: |
||
10 | |||
11 | * Discussion on survey data |
||
12 | ** Survey produces xit format which appears to be proprietary binary format - requires Spatial Analyzer tool developed by New River Kinematics www.kinematics.com; DL survey crew have a licence, Jason Tarrant may also have a licence. |
||
13 | *** What if they go out of business? |
||
14 | ** Each new survey results in a new xit file |
||
15 | *** No clear dissemination/back up policy on these files |
||
16 | 2 | Nebrensky, Henry | *** Outline agreement that copies of these should be stored on MOM laptop which is backed up |
17 | *** either emailed to MOM after each survey, or MOM can put them on a USB stick before surveyor leaves RAL |
||
18 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | ** Did not discuss how survey should be documented; but documentation is probably required |
19 | ** Established that the survey coordinates are either left-handed or right-handed (and a conversion is not trivial) - but not which one. Presumably this comes through from the CAD model anyway. |
||
20 | |||
21 | * Discussion on survey details |
||
22 | ** Centre line D2-MICE-beamline |
||
23 | 4 | Rogers, Chris | *** *X* axis (D2-MICE-beamline) defined by least squares fit to quadrupole _mirror-plate_ apertures for Q4-9 |
24 | 3 | Nebrensky, Henry | *** define line-on-floor by looking at reference points on floor - brass plate under D2; floor target(sticker) in front of Q4; floor target(sticker) below the Ckovs |
25 | 4 | Rogers, Chris | *** *Z* axis is defined by fitting to plane that includes line-on-floor and D2-MICE-beamline; and taking a line in that plane that is perpendicular to D2-MICE-beamline |
26 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | ** Some discussion - how do we get a handle on where D1-D2 line is pointing wrt D2-MICE-beamline? |
27 | 2 | Nebrensky, Henry | *** Proposed measuring around solenoid exit aperture and taking the mean to get a handle on solenoid downstream end placement |
28 | **** This requires removing the Proton Absorbers and possibly GVA1; hope to do this within the pneumatic proton absorber upgrade process. Hopefully PA apertures would end up aligned on beam centre |
||
29 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | *** No clear technique for getting the upstream end placement |
30 | *** Noted that it was not clear that the D1-D2 line sits in the x-y plane as defined above; and this should not be assumed (if possible) |
||
31 | ** And finally |
||
32 | *** Emphasised that of all beamline components, TOF positions are most crucial to measure well. |
||
33 | 4 | Rogers, Chris | |
34 | For reference, note that the _surveyor's_ co-ordinate system for the MICE Hall and Cooling Channel is as follows: |
||
35 | * *X* is along beamline with beam travelling in positive direction |
||
36 | * *Y* is across beamline; positive points south (towards MLCR) |
||
37 | * *Z* is vertical with up in positive direction |