Geometry-validation-criteria¶

We want to come up with some criteria and benchmarks for validating the CAD-based geometry.

1. Beamline fields
   • With a reference run setting
     1. Do particles get around D2 with the appropriate momentum bite?
     2. Is the transmission ok?
     3. Cross-check against John Nugent's G4BL simulation of the beamline
2. Step IV cooling channel fields
   • For a 200 MeV/c, 6 mm ε _⊥
     1. Is the transmission ok?
     2. Check β _⊥
3. Materials
   1. Check energy loss for consistency with Bethe-Bloch at 10% level per object
   2. Create material budget table for cross-check by Jason Tarrant
4. Loading and Processing times
   1. For just pure Monte Carlo, we'd like to keep the processing time to ~ 0.1s per good event
   2. Benchmark loading time
   3. Benchmark processing time