11-06-2015 » History » Version 4
George, Melissa, 11 June 2015 16:42
1 | 1 | George, Melissa | h1. 11-06-2015 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | George, Melissa | |
3 | Jan Efficiency updates: |
||
4 | - Latest efficiency looks pretty good |
||
5 | - Huge improvement since using tracker plane 4 rather than 2. What does this mean as the distance shouldn't make any difference???? |
||
6 | - Remove TOF2 and KL run again comparing stations 2 and 4 now that possible energy loss material is removed. If no change then its dE/dx if change then there is a distance issue, which must be fixed. |
||
7 | - Expecting improvements again following Kalman changes next week. |
||
8 | |||
9 | Melissa: |
||
10 | 4 | George, Melissa | dE/dx a little scuppered by trunk broken... but moving on |
11 | 1 | George, Melissa | |
12 | 4 | George, Melissa | |
13 | |||
14 | 2 | George, Melissa | Done: |
15 | 4 | George, Melissa | DS Tracks (100% - tweaks) |
16 | 2 | George, Melissa | US Tracks (-dE/dx) |
17 | |||
18 | PDFs for all TOFS, KL, EMR, Trackers in large stats of e mu and pions |
||
19 | |||
20 | To Do: |
||
21 | 1 | George, Melissa | |
22 | 2 | George, Melissa | Jan: |
23 | 4 | George, Melissa | * Send efficiency equations with descriptions of each point |
24 | 3 | George, Melissa | * Plot xy positions of hits in Tracker station 2 vs 4 in two diff colours same plot of x against y. |
25 | 1 | George, Melissa | * Plot x positions of MC hits-recon hits against local recon error |
26 | 3 | George, Melissa | * Plot y positions of MC hits-recon hits against local recon error (in all these cases they should never be outside the error. |
27 | 4 | George, Melissa | * Ensure Tracker trackpoint that acts as in initial track matches well to MC. Also check Pt on that trackpoint is good and tighten to see whether sample has better efficiency. |
28 | 3 | George, Melissa | * Remove TOF2 and KL run again comparing stations 2 and 4 now that possible energy loss material is removed. If no change then its dE/dx if change then there is a distance issue, which must be fixed. |
29 | 4 | George, Melissa | * Use RK to plot from tracker stations 1 to 4. |
30 | 2 | George, Melissa | * Throughgoing track efficiency |
31 | 1 | George, Melissa | * Be sure US tracks are ready for dE/dx/ |
32 | * start thinking about track fitting |
||
33 | |||
34 | 2 | George, Melissa | Celeste: |
35 | Finish large stats pion and positron pdfs for all detectors |
||
36 | 4 | George, Melissa | For Throughgoing - Still need these |
37 | US (500 mu, positron & pion each in samples) |
||
38 | DS (500 mu, positron & pion each in samples) will need to rerun if Francois EMR variables go in. |
||
39 | 2 | George, Melissa | (efficiency purity based on them) |
40 | |||
41 | Melissa: |
||
42 | dE/dx |
||
43 | talk with subdetectors and determin alignment plan and beam |
||
44 | errors for Celeste |
||
45 | |||
46 | Future: |
||
47 | We need to be ready for throughgoing alignment: |
||
48 | We may need track fitting for the throughgoing and this may become urgent |
||
49 | determin fiducial angle cut for the above |
||
50 | Melissa talk with subdetectors and determin alignment plan and beam settings |
||
51 | All to agree thoughgoing alignment |
||
52 | Simulate PRY end plate?? |