Project

General

Profile

System Performance Paper Draft 3 » History » Version 14

Franchini, Paolo, 09 July 2020 11:40

1 10 Franchini, Paolo
h1. System Performance Paper Draft - Meeting 3
2 1 Rogers, Chris
3 2 Rogers, Chris
< [[System_Performance_Paper_Draft_2| Last meeting]] | [[System_Performance_Paper_Draft_4| Next meeting]] >
4
5 6 Rogers, Chris
We will have another review meeting on Thursday June 11th at 14:00 BST. 
6 3 Rogers, Chris
7 4 Rogers, Chris
Zoom information below (if you can't get in, let Chris Rogers know)
8 3 Rogers, Chris
9
[[computing-software:MICE_zoom_info]] - login required
10 7 Franchini, Paolo
11
Links:
12 9 Franchini, Paolo
* Performance of the MICE diagnostic system, second draft: *attachment:Systems-performance_Draft-2.pdf*
13 7 Franchini, Paolo
14 11 Rogers, Chris
h2. Notes
15
16
Present:
17
18
Alan Bross
19
Ludovico Tortora
20
Paolo Franchini
21
Paul Kyberd
22
Ken Long
23
Chris Rogers
24
25
PF:
26
3 outstanding items
27
* Table summarising PID
28 13 Franchini, Paolo
*Done for the information avaialble in the paper.*
29 11 Rogers, Chris
* Merging of 3 sections
30 13 Franchini, Paolo
*Done.*
31 11 Rogers, Chris
* Ckov
32
33
We discussed Ckov - Paolo described slides
34
* ABr comments that the beta gamma plot (slide 6) looks nice; recommends we don't put on the fit line.
35
* LT: how much can we increase stats? PF: probably factor 4; CR: make the frame fill dark blue so 0 stats bins are consistently coloured
36 13 Franchini, Paolo
*Included the beta gamma plot, with 8 times the statistics shown before*
37 11 Rogers, Chris
38
Otherwise comments have been implemented
39
40
ABr - happy to move to a paper, subject to these actions
41
LT - I sent some additional comments a couple of days ago, where are they? PF: I will implement them in version 3
42
LT - subject to corrections, happy to move to a paper
43
44
CR - PF will implement outstanding actions; send back to LT and ABr; they will approve via email (we hope) and if okay we send through to Maurizio for Editorial Board sign off. Then some more effort to get wording, axis labels, etc correct. Reconvene referees before sending to the collaboration.
45
46
ABr notes that some of the axis labels are illegible; need work. CR notes that also need to add the usual MICE boilerplate text to the figures.
47 14 Franchini, Paolo
*Will do this in the meantime since will require some editing directly done on the images. It will basically report "MICE - MAUS v3.2.0" since most of the plots are agglomerate of several ISIS user cycles.*
48 11 Rogers, Chris
49
CR - the note that we have been reviewing should be made into a MICE note; and then we adjust for publication.
50
51
---
52
53 12 Franchini, Paolo
h3. Ludovico comments:
54 1 Rogers, Chris
55 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Line 62  :  … with 200 ps resolution …. but in Ref 12 is quoted ~ 100 ps   as in Table 7 . Coherent statements for TOF resolution.
56
*Done*
57 1 Rogers, Chris
58 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Line 105 :  “naive quadrature addition of slab DT….” should regard RMS and the result is 170 ps … why  RMS/2  in Chris comment ?
59
*Yes I agree. The Dt is the difference of two means, so the error it's the "sum" of two standard deviations* 
60 1 Rogers, Chris
61 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Fig. 3 and 4  :  RMS or Sigma  both
62
*Done. RMS in both*
63 1 Rogers, Chris
64 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Fig. 8 and 9  : Ther'is redundancy, I agree , but they are two complementary view of KL response:
65
   - at given energy for e-mu-pion
66
   - for e-mu-pion at various energies
67
  with efficiencies summarized in Table 1 as result of combined measurement with TOF. 
68
*I kept both.*
69 12 Franchini, Paolo
70 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Line 247 :  ….This is due BOTH to an increase in decay probability between
71 12 Franchini, Paolo
TOF2 and the EMR AND a decrease in the number of muons that cross the KL to reach the EMR.
72 13 Franchini, Paolo
*Done*
73 12 Franchini, Paolo
74 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Could we produce “equivalent” table for EMR as combined measurement with tracker ?  (i.e. as done for KL on Table 1 and Trackers on Table 2 and 3)
75
*Francois has been running this analysis. I need to investigate it with him. Have already asked him some work in the past that has been dropped from later draft, so would like to confirm that this is absolutely necessary (and still might not happen).*
76 12 Franchini, Paolo
77
- Memo from Draft 1 : I'd quote the calculated liquid-hydrogen density first, at line 423, and the computation of his uncertanty after, at line 425
78 13 Franchini, Paolo
*Done*
79 7 Franchini, Paolo
80 13 Franchini, Paolo
- Table 7 :  Extend and detail the global information producing an efficiency/resolution table of subdetectors vs muon momentum ?
81
*Done for the information avaialble in the paper.*
82 1 Rogers, Chris
83
---