PC-2015-12-17-optics » History » Revision 7
Revision 6 (Rogers, Chris, 18 December 2015 09:32) → Revision 7/8 (Rogers, Chris, 18 December 2015 09:44)
h1. PC-2015-12-17-optics
15:00 in the ATLAS building
h2. Phone Details
http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html
h2. Agenda
* Field mapping (Victoria/John Cobb/Jo Langford)
* Theoretical magnet parameters and effect of iron (Jaroslaw/Victoria)
** [[Field map of SSU for 7th October run]]
* Transfer matrix and magnet alignment (Sophie/Chris Rogers)
* Beamline commissioning (Victoria/Jaroslaw)
** Contingency if DS is not available in 2016
** Beamline commissioning data in December?
* Optics without M1 at SSD (Chris Rogers/Scott Berg)
** Tracking (Ao/Ryan/Chris Hunt/Chris Rogers)
** Algorithm to calculate the phase space volume (vs RMS emittance)
** Track fitting/extrapolation for indirect emittance measurement
* Bayesian analysis (Rob Ryne)
* Demonstration of Ionisation Cooling paper (Jaroslaw/JB Lagrange)
* Demonstration of Ionisation Cooling optics w/o Match Coil 1 in downstream Spectrometer Solenoid (Dave Neuffer)
* Demonstration of Ionisation Cooling alignment and tolerances (Alan Young)
* Date of next meeting
** 7th January optics review special?
** 14/15 January optics review
h2. Notes
Hall probes
* Time is negative
* Hall probe closest to end plate is "-67"
* Rogers: compare hall probe with field during the ramp
Transfer matrix and optical alignment
* Looking at straight tracks data and calculating transfer matrix, compare with theory
Step IV optics
* ACTION BROSS: revised SSD limits with previous quench limit and safety factor
* Bross: Need to add the fiducial cuts
* Pasternak: use emittance of 140/200*6
** Rogers: send an explanation?
* Tracker beampipe 200 mm should be 150 mm
* Hybrid mode: Bross - from hardware pov no problem; may require additional training
** Risk that we may get additional training
* Rogers raised issue on M2 operation
** Alan Bross: does not believe that running M2 increases the risks
** Jaroslaw Pasternak: concerns about risk to push emittance measurement to the end
** Jaroslaw Pasternak: can we get good enough transmission? Ao has run simulations that show we can
* John Cobb: we have not shown that we have a solution
** There is no plot that we can stand behind at the 100 % level
** Scott has demonstrated that we increase the phase space density
** Rogers: we need to do the full reconstruction and analysis chain for an optimised run
** Scott: and we should do the full analysis that shows particles didn't scatter out of the aperture to produce amplitude increase (or whatever)
** Bross: we will need to have a crisp answer to the discussion at the review
* Bross: further comments for Ao are welcome (by email)