Actions
Materials¶
Can we try for another material physics "weekly" Friday 23rd at 15:00.
Let's try for the phone conference line defined in
http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html
Agenda like:
- Energy loss - Rhys Gardener, Dimitrije Maletic
- Multiple Scattering (field off) - John Nugent #1789
- Multiple Scattering (field on) - Celeste Pidcott
- References list
Cheers,
Chris
Notes¶
Chris Rogers
Rhys Gardener
John Nugent
Rhys Gardener¶
- Sorting out onmon
- Going through mountain of reference leads
- Will continue to update the document list
- Measurements where they measured the gap between bubbles in the bubble chamber
John Nugent¶
- Misalignment analysis is not complete - suspect asymmetry from misalignment analysis (or maybe tracker misreconstruction)
- Should be running the MC with not misaligned detectors in the first instance
- Systematics
- Not sensitive to PID?
- Looking at fiducial volume of the absorber
- Looks like radial cut does not muck the statistics
- No consideration of thickness dependence on radius
- Looking at momentum dependence
- > 10 % change in Gaussian RMS
- Note the error analysis in MuScat
- Say 1.9 radiation lengths upper edge bin 0.008 +/- 0.003 rad^{-1}
- Gives p(particle) = 0.008*(0.1151-0.0938) = 0.0001704
- Purely statistical basis need 50,000 muons in the sample
- Where does the factor 20 come from?
- What is the change in number of particles per bin per momentum (consider using PDG formula rather than full MC)
- What is the change in number of particles per bin per absorber thickness (consider using PDG formula rather than full MC)
- Note that absorber thickness is a function of radius (and track angle)
- Redo plots showing probability per radian using MuScat binning
- Redo plots showing number of events using muscat binning
- Do data rate analysis with pion beam
- Slides followed up by a note
DONM: 15:00 on Wednesday
Updated by Rogers, Chris over 7 years ago ยท 7 revisions