2020-11-05 scattering author's meeting¶

14:00 GMT on Thursday 5th November 2020 (UK is now on winter time)

Phone Details¶

[[computing-software:MICE_zoom_info|MICE Zoom Connection]] (login required)

Explicitly mention that a large systematic error is taken for TOF resolution when talking about TOF correction in sampling.
Explicitly mention that a large systematic error is taken for TOF resolution when discussing momentum residuals plots.
Add further clarification on chi^2 cut - specifically, TKU only is used in the sample selection. Events which have a bad TKD chi^2 are sent to the overflow bin and considered to be inefficiency.
Be clear on fig. 12 and 13 - in these figures, a position correction has not been done but an angle correction has been done.
Clarify which method is used to do the alignment correction (mean angle)
Add stats box to fig. 18(d)
Why is there a big different between TOF systematic error in delta theta_x vs delta theta_y (172 MeV/c data)?
Table 11 and 12: chi^2/DOF looks too high; it should be about 1, based on the figures, whereas it is more like about 8 in some cases. This means that the points are, on average, a few sigma away.
Table 11 and 12: KS test looks funny in some cases. Please list the KS distance as well.

Additional:

In the light of discussion on errors - why are the stats errors so big for the model data in fig. 31 (deconvolved distributions). Do you not have "infinite" stats here?

Files (1)