Project

General

Profile

2019-03-18 amp-evolv » History » Version 14

Rogers, Chris, 26 March 2019 14:56

1 1 Rogers, Chris
h1. 2019-03-18 amp-evolv
2
3
17:00 GMT Monday 18th March
4
5
http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html
6
7
h2. Actions
8
9
intro (KL)
10
-0th paragraph add section headings
11
-1st paragraph needs revision; check historical details
12
-3rd paragraph need caveat on e+e-
13 14 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* 4th paragraph need frictional cooling
14 1 Rogers, Chris
15
observables (CR)
16
-introduce cooling formula; but phrased ito amplitude (FD)- -_CR to integrate with paper (CR)_-
17
-remove sentence regarding 9% centile just before eq 1-
18
-Add a sentence regarding "human readable" what is kNN algorithm- -_FD to check CR's understanding (FD)_-
19
-Joining sentence between "observables" and "MICE"-
20
21
MICE
22
(CR) -contact Jason Tarrant and photo repro regarding image- _for now keep working on it amongst ourselves_
23
(FD) -upload schematic latex to overleaf-
24
(FD) -Add labels to schematic; make lH2 not LiH absorber; general "look and feel" stuff-
25
(CR) -remove phase space figure to MICE note; consider 2d amplitude plot instead a la Francois thesis figure 6.25-
26
27
28
Results
29 12 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) francois asked by email - why is mc_reco sample size not same as reco sample size (they are supposed to be same sample _it is impurity at high radius (tracks in MC fiducial but not data fiducial); is impurity properly handled by correction mechanism? Need to check; relies on migration matrix non-unitary_
30 1 Rogers, Chris
(CR) -investigate the 17.5 mm bin issue esp at 10-140- _could check rebinning but low priority for now_
31
(CR) -investigate the scraping aperture _looks like it is MC offset_-; add a vertical line corresponding to the scraping aperture; comment in text
32 6 Rogers, Chris
(FD) -fractional emittance is better than most significant bin as a table-
33 1 Rogers, Chris
(FD) -need to do the efficiency correction on fractional emittance-
34
(FD) -need to do the efficiency correction on density-
35
(CR) -Check apertures in lH2 vs None absorber; KL claims window aperture should be mostly not there in "None"-
36 7 Rogers, Chris
(CR/FD) -Check systematic for density plot in TKU 10 mm; why is SSU CC giving such large uncertainty?-
37 1 Rogers, Chris
38
h2. Notes from CM53
39
40
41
Try Nature before Nature physics
42
43
Fig. 1 - schematic
44
(CR) -Preferably plot B_{z}, or introduce an arbitrary factor of -1 after the absorber, or label as |B|-
45
(CR) -Note that the sigma(x) plot comes from linear beam optics calculation-
46
47
Fig. 2 - phase space 2d plots
48
(CR) Interesting that there is a cliff in the x-py and y-px plots. Is this diffuser aperture (or some other aperture)
49 8 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) If show Phase space plots, put one beam ellipse on _won't show ellipse_
50 1 Rogers, Chris
51
Fig. 3 - amplitude pdf
52 10 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) Add the amplitude pdf plot without corrections to the supplementary information
53 1 Rogers, Chris
(CR) -Plot amplitude pdf as a histogram or without horizontal errors-
54
(CR) Afterwards, JHC pointed out that log(n) vs sqrt(A) is linear for Gaussian beam. It might just confuse people to plot it.
55 13 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) Vertical axis label is wrong. Normalisation needs to be explained.
56 1 Rogers, Chris
57
Fig. 4 - pdf ratio
58
(CR) -Make MC less visible in pdf ratio plot - it tends to dominate-
59
(CR) Increase the MC stats (implies going to production MC, it is time)
60
61
Fig. 5 - cdf ratio
62
(CR) -The number of significant figures in the table is too great. Need to understand the difference between the errors for different data-
63
(CR) -John and KL asked for raw pdf numbers-
64
(CR) -Discussion of which bin to choose and how to quantify the level at which we observe cooling-
65
* Soler suggested CLS method
66
* -Others suggested looking at significance of first bin rather than most significant bin-
67
68
(CR) -Move the points to the bin edge, not bin centre; look and feel issues-
69 8 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) Check systematic error correlations are handled correctly
70 1 Rogers, Chris
71
(CR) -General - check the systematic error is reasonable; e.g. do we need to include big error for SSU and for SSD; check we only use -ve error in SSU-
72
(CR) General - move to production
73
74
h2. Other jobs
75
76 5 Rogers, Chris
(CR) -Check - why is the systematic error so much higher on density plot than e.g. amplitude pdf plot?-
77 1 Rogers, Chris
(CR) -Add labels to schematic-
78 8 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) Fix or explain kink in 10-140 plot amplitdue pdf
79 9 Rogers, Chris
*DONE but needs second pass* (CR) Write methods section
80 1 Rogers, Chris
(CR) Update MICE Note
81
(FD) -Add comment noting the beam used for the Poincare plot-
82 4 Rogers, Chris
(FD) -Add date to the schematic-
83
(ALL) Stats test for table
84 8 Rogers, Chris
*DONE* (CR) Data to francois for poincare section
85
(FD) Poincare section plots
86 11 Rogers, Chris
(CR) Fix bibliography; should reference as much as possible up to 50 refs!