2019-02-22-amp-evolv-paper » History » Revision 2

« Previous | Revision 2/7 (diff) | Next »
Rogers, Chris, 22 February 2019 17:49



intro (KL)
0th paragraph add section headings
1st paragraph needs revision; check historical details
3rd paragraph need caveat on e+e-
4th paragraph need frictional cooling

observables (CR)
introduce cooling formula; but phrased ito amplitude (FD) CR to integrate with paper (CR)
remove sentence regarding 9% centile just before eq 1
Add a sentence regarding "human readable" what is kNN algorithm FD to check CR's understanding (FD)
Joining sentence between "observables" and "MICE"

(CR) contact Jason Tarrant and photo repro regarding image for now keep working on it amongst ourselves
(FD) upload schematic latex to overleaf
(CR) remove phase space figure to MICE note; consider 2d amplitude plot instead a la Francois thesis figure 6.25

(CR) investigate the 17.5 mm bin issue esp at 10-140 could check rebinning but low priority for now
(CR) francois asked by email - why is mc_reco sample size not same as reco sample size (they are supposed to be same sample
(CR) investigate the scraping aperture looks like it is MC offset; add a vertical line corresponding to the scraping aperture; comment in text
(FD) fractional emittance is better than most significant bin as a table
(FD) need to do the efficiency correction on fractional emittance
(FD) need to do the efficiency correction on density
(CR) Check apertures in lH2 vs None absorber; KL claims window aperture should be mostly not there in "None"
(CR/FD) Check systematic for density in TKU 10 mm; why is SSU CC giving such large uncertainty?

Notes from CM53

(CR) Mash in notes from CM53 that are on my emails

Updated by Rogers, Chris over 5 years ago · 2 revisions