2019-01-30-amp-evolv-paper » History » Version 5
Rogers, Chris, 15 February 2019 17:59
1 | 5 | Rogers, Chris | h1. Author's Meeting |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | Friday 8th Feb 2019 (note that the url is wrong) |
||
4 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | |
5 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | 15:00 GMT |
6 | |||
7 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html |
8 | 3 | Rogers, Chris | |
9 | h2. Notes |
||
10 | |||
11 | intro (KL) |
||
12 | 0th paragraph add section headings |
||
13 | 1st paragraph needs revision; check historical details |
||
14 | 3rd paragraph need caveat on e+e- |
||
15 | 4th paragraph need frictional cooling |
||
16 | |||
17 | observables (CR) |
||
18 | introduce cooling formula; but phrased ito amplitude (FD) |
||
19 | remove sentence regarding 9% centile just before eq 1 |
||
20 | Add a sentence regarding "human readable" what is kNN algorithm |
||
21 | Joining sentence between "observables" and "MICE" |
||
22 | |||
23 | MICE |
||
24 | (CR) contact Jason Tarrant and photo repro regarding image |
||
25 | further KL edits |
||
26 | (CR) remove phase space figure to MICE note; consider 2d amplitude plot instead a la Francois thesis figure 6.25 |
||
27 | |||
28 | Results |
||
29 | (CR) investigate the 17.5 mm bin issue esp at 10-140 |
||
30 | (CR) investigate the scraping aperture; add a vertical line corresponding to the scraping aperture; comment in text |
||
31 | (FD) fractional emittance is better than most significant bin as a table |
||
32 | (FD) need to do the efficiency correction on density |
||
33 | 4 | Rogers, Chris | (CR) Check apertures in lH2 vs None absorber; KL claims window aperture be mostly not there in "None" |
34 | 3 | Rogers, Chris | |
35 | Meet again next week - plan for Friday 15th 3 pm, KL to confirm by email |