2018-06-25 analysis-working-party » History » Version 20
Rogers, Chris, 26 June 2018 11:43
1 | 3 | Rogers, Chris | h1. Analysis Working Party |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | Franchini, Paolo | |
3 | 10 | Rogers, Chris | Start time is 9 am on Monday 25th June, 10 am on Tuesday 26th. The room will not be locked overnight so feel free to come in earlier (and/or stay later). |
4 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | |
5 | 7 | Rogers, Chris | We will be in CR13, near the South car park. There is a map here: attachment:RALSitePlan.pdf |
6 | 6 | Rogers, Chris | |
7 | 1 | Franchini, Paolo | h2. System performance paper: Monday morning |
8 | 4 | Rogers, Chris | |
9 | [[System-performance-paper_2018-06-25|System performance paper meeting page]] |
||
10 | 9 | Rogers, Chris | |
11 | h2. Scattering - referees: Monday afternoon |
||
12 | 11 | Hunt, Christopher | |
13 | h2. Long Emittance Paper: Tuesday Morning? |
||
14 | |||
15 | h3. Discussion Objectives |
||
16 | |||
17 | * Convergence of the MC simulation Model |
||
18 | 14 | Rogers, Chris | ** Dipoole model implemented; target model not implemented but doesn't appear to be sensitive |
19 | ** Tracker model believe implemented |
||
20 | *** Plan to measure density and geometry by <someone> |
||
21 | *** Plan to look at chi2 of straight tracks |
||
22 | 12 | Hunt, Christopher | * Plan for the integration of field models into systematics studies |
23 | 18 | Rogers, Chris | ** Asked Joe L to upload the field map files; Paul J looking into comparing with MAUS models |
24 | 11 | Hunt, Christopher | * Performance of track fit and possible future upgrades |
25 | 17 | Rogers, Chris | ** Discussed issues to do with track fitting and low pt tracks; comments from Francois by email |
26 | 15 | Rogers, Chris | ** Chris H reviewed tracker tof refit routines and Chris R agreed to have a go at running them |
27 | 16 | Rogers, Chris | ** Chris H has done some track fitting using non-uniform fitter; it might work |
28 | 13 | Hunt, Christopher | * Standardize the datasets and some cuts |
29 | 17 | Rogers, Chris | ** Discussed using all (within reason) data |
30 | ** Discussed presentation of results |
||
31 | *** Propose sum all beam line settings for a CC magnet configuration; select subsamples for analysis |
||
32 | *** Selected configurations comparison of emittance change vs input emittance |
||
33 | *** Comparison of equilibrium emittance vs CC magnet configuration |
||
34 | *** Parameterisation of amplitude change to exclude aberrations and emittance growth; comparison vs CC magnet configurations |
||
35 | 19 | Rogers, Chris | |
36 | h3. Tuesday |
||
37 | |||
38 | Target discussion |
||
39 | * Discussed plans for the target model |
||
40 | 20 | Rogers, Chris | |
41 | 19 | Rogers, Chris | Some diffuser discussion |
42 | * Looked at high radius issue for 10 mm beam |
||
43 | * Discussed modified geometry model as implemented by Durga/Rogers |
||
44 | 20 | Rogers, Chris | |
45 | 19 | Rogers, Chris | Some tracker discussion |
46 | * Discussed chi2 issue |
||
47 | * Discussed MC dead channels issue |
||
48 | * Chris H promises to deliver plot for system performance paper |
||
49 | 20 | Rogers, Chris | |
50 | 19 | Rogers, Chris | Energy loss analysis |
51 | * Working through systematic uncertainties |