Project

General

Profile

2018-06-25 analysis-working-party » History » Version 20

Rogers, Chris, 26 June 2018 11:43

1 3 Rogers, Chris
h1. Analysis Working Party
2 1 Franchini, Paolo
3 10 Rogers, Chris
Start time is 9 am on Monday 25th June, 10 am on Tuesday 26th. The room will not be locked overnight so feel free to come in earlier (and/or stay later).
4 2 Rogers, Chris
5 7 Rogers, Chris
We will be in CR13, near the South car park. There is a map here: attachment:RALSitePlan.pdf
6 6 Rogers, Chris
7 1 Franchini, Paolo
h2. System performance paper: Monday morning
8 4 Rogers, Chris
9
[[System-performance-paper_2018-06-25|System performance paper meeting page]]
10 9 Rogers, Chris
11
h2. Scattering - referees: Monday afternoon
12 11 Hunt, Christopher
13
h2. Long Emittance Paper: Tuesday Morning?
14
15
h3. Discussion Objectives
16
17
* Convergence of the MC simulation Model
18 14 Rogers, Chris
** Dipoole model implemented; target model not implemented but doesn't appear to be sensitive
19
** Tracker model believe implemented
20
*** Plan to measure density and geometry by <someone>
21
*** Plan to look at chi2 of straight tracks
22 12 Hunt, Christopher
* Plan for the integration of field models into systematics studies
23 18 Rogers, Chris
** Asked Joe L to upload the field map files; Paul J looking into comparing with MAUS models
24 11 Hunt, Christopher
* Performance of track fit and possible future upgrades
25 17 Rogers, Chris
** Discussed issues to do with track fitting and low pt tracks; comments from Francois by email
26 15 Rogers, Chris
** Chris H reviewed tracker tof refit routines and Chris R agreed to have a go at running them
27 16 Rogers, Chris
** Chris H has done some track fitting using non-uniform fitter; it might work
28 13 Hunt, Christopher
* Standardize the datasets and some cuts
29 17 Rogers, Chris
** Discussed using all (within reason) data
30
** Discussed presentation of results
31
*** Propose sum all beam line settings for a CC magnet configuration; select subsamples for analysis
32
*** Selected configurations comparison of emittance change vs input emittance
33
*** Comparison of equilibrium emittance vs CC magnet configuration
34
*** Parameterisation of amplitude change to exclude aberrations and emittance growth; comparison vs CC magnet configurations
35 19 Rogers, Chris
36
h3. Tuesday
37
38
Target discussion
39
* Discussed plans for the target model
40 20 Rogers, Chris
41 19 Rogers, Chris
Some diffuser discussion
42
* Looked at high radius issue for 10 mm beam
43
* Discussed modified geometry model as implemented by Durga/Rogers
44 20 Rogers, Chris
45 19 Rogers, Chris
Some tracker discussion
46
* Discussed chi2 issue
47
* Discussed MC dead channels issue
48
* Chris H promises to deliver plot for system performance paper
49 20 Rogers, Chris
50 19 Rogers, Chris
Energy loss analysis
51
* Working through systematic uncertainties