2017-12-06-emittance » History » Version 2
Rogers, Chris, 06 December 2017 16:50
1 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | h1. 2017-12-06-emittance |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | Emittance paper |
||
4 | |||
5 | Present: |
||
6 | * Ken Long |
||
7 | * Chris Hunt |
||
8 | * Victoria Blackmore |
||
9 | * Chris Rogers |
||
10 | |||
11 | We started working our way through the emittance paper |
||
12 | * KL noted that it's time to standardise the cuts |
||
13 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | * CR noted need to remove "0" space points line from the TOF "number of space points per trigger" plot (*Action VB*) |
14 | * CR noted the tracker butterfly as a possible aperture cut (*Action VB*) |
||
15 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | |
16 | * Discussed handling of low pt tracks in TKU recon |
||
17 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | * CH described the track fit algorithm using TOF01 as a seed and he has a preliminary code; CR notes that this comes before global recon; so diffuser cannot be managed well; CR notes that multiple/deficient space points are not well-handled; this is all okay as it is consistent with VB cuts. Agreed that CH will pass preliminary reconstructed datasets to VB for analysis (*Action CH*) prior to code release in mid-December |
18 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | |
19 | * Discussed handling of field/momentum scale |
||
20 | ** KL: the hall probe calibration was done very carefully; so we believe the field measurement; the position has greater uncertainty; will be addressed during decommissioning phase |
||
21 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | ** Plan to scale the tracker field to the hall probes and redo the reconstruction; assume that this is sufficient (*Action CH/DR*) |
22 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | |
23 | * Discussed handling of tracker chi2 |
||
24 | ** CR: check the straight tracks MC vs data; that validates the scattering model and hardware construction (Action CH) |
||
25 | ** Doesn't validate the field model or the energy loss |
||
26 | ** Then we move on to the helix; this is indicative of the field and energy loss |
||
27 | ** CH notes that he does see a difference between different energy loss models |
||
28 | ** Investigate different tracker alignments and field models |
||
29 | ** Note we still have to check the dead channel map is properly simulated |
||
30 | |||
31 | * Discussed discrepancy between MC momentum and tracker momentum |
||
32 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | ** VB: Reweight based on momentum measured in TOF using Rayner (*Action VB*) |
33 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | |
34 | 2 | Rogers, Chris | Note that still need quantitative estimate of the uncertainty involved in the reconstruction (*Action VB*) |
35 | 1 | Rogers, Chris | |
36 | Reminder for referee's meeting on Monday 16th January |