2017-12-05-physics-shifter » History » Revision 4
Revision 3 (Rogers, Chris, 08 December 2017 12:25) → Revision 4/14 (Rogers, Chris, 08 December 2017 12:54)
h1. 2017-12-05-physics-shifter
h1. 2017-11-30 physics-shifter
*Start Date:* 2017-12-05
*End Date:*
*Start Run:* 10432
*End Run:*
*Physics shifter*: Chris Rogers
h2. Summary
The aim was to get the empty data for corresponding LiH full settings:
* 5th December - possibly recover magnets following a quench
* 6th December - 2016-05.1 setting (flip mode, 140 MeV/c)
* 7th December - 2017-02-7 setting (flip mode, 140 MeV/c)
* 8th December - 2017-02-8 setting (flip mode, 170 MeV/c)
h3. Elog, CDB
h3. Online reco
h2. Analysis
h3. 5th December
No data
h3. 6th December
Checked:
* TOF1 dt is 50 ps, still not great; TOF0 and TOF2 slab conversion to space point efficiency ~ 97-98 %
* TKU, TKD has no obvious dead area
* Amplitude change looks okay. Notice more scraping than with M2D data sets.
* I spend some time staring at the chi2 plots in TKD. TKD has a longer tail, but I think it is not significant. Comparing e.g. chi2/ndf = 4, with the peak chi2, the ratio is < 10^-3 for both TKU and TKD. But TKD has a longish tail beyond - all at < 10^-3 level, so did not dig further. I also note TKD has fewer ndf, potentially indicating less successful track finding from PR; again, something to dig into (but data is probably okay).