Actions
2016-11-22-straight-tracks-paper » History » Revision 3
« Previous |
Revision 3/9
(diff)
| Next »
Rogers, Chris, 23 November 2016 13:50
2016-11-22-straight-tracks-paper¶
http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html
Note:
http://mice.iit.edu/micenotes/public/pdf/MICE0497/MICE0497.pdf
Notes¶
Present:
John Cobb
Paul Soler
Mariyan Bogomilov
Chris Rogers
Alan Young
Ryan Bayes
Page 1¶
First three comments may be more appropriate for the paper rather than the MICE note- Should defend choice of Xenon
- Should define symbols in emittance formula
- Should define equilibrium emittance
- "Thus, despite the limited angular range it is extremely attractive as a direct measure of the
scattering of muons" Need to add some more quantitative discussion of angular acceptance.
Page 2¶
- Table 1: Row for Al numbers are suspect - correct
- Table 1: General comment that some description of the material budget is required; how much material and where?
- Table 1: In similar vein, some description of absorber is necessary
- Scattering angle definitions eqn (3) and (4) are not correct - see supplementary note from JHC
- Correction
theta = \sqrt(<theta_scatt>)
should betheta = \sqrt(<theta^2>)
- There was some discussion over the use of a Gaussian fit, as mentioned in final sentence of 1.1. Comment that the description would be better in the "analysis" section where the relevant measurements and plots are listed.
- 0.0038 should be 0.038
- Comment that section 1.2 needs a lot of work; it was not reviewed in detail.
Page 3¶
Updated by Rogers, Chris about 7 years ago · 3 revisions