2016-09-15-emittance¶

14:00 Thursday 15th September

http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html

Scott/Durga:

• Estimate of the systematic error associated with rate-dependence in TOF?
• Source of bias and the "100 ps" affect

Chris Hunt and Rogers

• What dos the p-value distribution look like? Are the p-values not uniform if not, why not?
• What is the error on tracker recon introduced by the field non-uniformity?
• What is the error on tracker recon introduced by the disagreement between model and field maps cf: slide 3 of
  https://indico.cern.ch/event/485764/contribution/2005672/attachments/1249829/1842249/fieldmapping.pdf

Jan, Yingpeng and Rogers:

• What is the source of disagreement between TOF and tracker?
  • What is the material budget between TOF and tracker? Is it correct? (See Francois also)
  • What is the solenoid alignment like

Joe and Victoria:

• Further analysis of discrepancy between the Hall probes and OPERA?
• Continue trying to untangle the field mapping data for SSU

Francois:

• Can the agreement between MC and data be improved? Dipole fiddling?
  • At what statistical significance do MC and data disagree?
  • What are the systematic errors (e.g. from quad/dipole/solenoid settings, incorrect material model etc)?

Victoria:

• Decoupled/2D emittance calculation?
• Diffuser scraping effect vs extrapolated tracks?