Project

General

Profile

2016-07-07-emittance » History » Version 2

Rogers, Chris, 07 July 2016 12:38

1 1 Rogers, Chris
h1. 2016-07-07-emittance
2
3
4 2 Rogers, Chris
Friday 7th July 14:00 BST; we will be in the MICE meeting room in R1.
5 1 Rogers, Chris
6
Phone details:
7
8
http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html
9
10
h2. Agenda
11
12
13
Durga:
14
* Estimate of the systematic error associated with rate-dependence in TOF?
15
* Does TOF calibration vs path length help at all?
16
17
Chris Hunt and Rogers
18
* What dos the p-value distribution look like? Are the p-values not uniform if not, why not?
19
* What is the error on tracker recon introduced by the field non-uniformity?
20
* What is the error on tracker recon introduced by the disagreement between model and field maps cf: slide 3 of
21
https://indico.cern.ch/event/485764/contribution/2005672/attachments/1249829/1842249/fieldmapping.pdf
22
23
Scott and Tanaz:
24
* What is the impurity reported by MC, based on Scott cuts?
25
* Can we confirm that the muon shoulder arises due to diffuser? i.e. extrapolate reconstructed tracks back to the diffuser position, what is the radius?
26
27
Celeste:
28
* Any results for likelihood-based PID?
29
30
Jan, Yingpeng and Rogers:
31
* What is the source of disagreement between TOF and tracker? 
32
** What is the material budget between TOF and tracker? Is it correct? (See Francois also)
33
** What is the solenoid alignment like
34
35
Joe and Victoria:
36
* Are the OPERA model and Hall probes consistent? How big are the inconsistencies?
37
* Continue trying to untangle the field mapping data for SSU
38
39
Francois:
40
* Can the agreement between MC and data be improved?
41
** At what statistical significance do MC and data disagree?
42
** What are the systematic errors (e.g. from quad/dipole/solenoid settings, incorrect material model etc)?
43
44
Victoria:
45
* Decoupled/2D emittance calculation?