Project

General

Profile

Bug #380

BTFieldConstructor::DoesFieldChangeEnergy() differs from parent BTField's version

Added by Tunnell, Christopher over 11 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Fields
Target version:
Start date:
19 March 2011
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Workflow:

Description

One implementation has a const and the other doesn't.

BTField.hh line 48
BTFieldConstructor line 68

Look at the const. The function doesn't get overwritten due to the definitional mismatch.

Also available in: Atom PDF