Bug #380
BTFieldConstructor::DoesFieldChangeEnergy() differs from parent BTField's version
Added by Tunnell, Christopher over 12 years ago.
Updated about 11 years ago.
Description
One implementation has a const and the other doesn't.
BTField.hh line 48
BTFieldConstructor line 68
Look at the const. The function doesn't get overwritten due to the definitional mismatch.
Same thing here:
not_overridden (Interpolator.hh:44)
bad_override (Interpolator.hh:180)
And here:
bad_override (BTSheet.cc:127)
not_overridden (BTField.hh:56)
- Target version changed from MAUS-v0.0.1 to Future MAUS release
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Target version changed from Future MAUS release to MAUS-v0.4.1
Also available in: Atom
PDF
