Project

General

Profile

Bug #380

BTFieldConstructor::DoesFieldChangeEnergy() differs from parent BTField's version

Added by Tunnell, Christopher over 10 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Fields
Target version:
Start date:
19 March 2011
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Workflow:

Description

One implementation has a const and the other doesn't.

BTField.hh line 48
BTFieldConstructor line 68

Look at the const. The function doesn't get overwritten due to the definitional mismatch.

#1

Updated by Tunnell, Christopher over 10 years ago

Same thing here:

not_overridden (Interpolator.hh:44)
bad_override (Interpolator.hh:180)

#2

Updated by Tunnell, Christopher over 10 years ago

And here:

bad_override (BTSheet.cc:127)
not_overridden (BTField.hh:56)

#3

Updated by Tunnell, Christopher over 10 years ago

  • Target version changed from MAUS-v0.0.1 to Future MAUS release
#4

Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 9 years ago

Fixed in rogers r896

#5

Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

Fixed in r837

#6

Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 9 years ago

  • Target version changed from Future MAUS release to MAUS-v0.4.1

Also available in: Atom PDF