Bug #380
BTFieldConstructor::DoesFieldChangeEnergy() differs from parent BTField's version
Start date:
19 March 2011
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
Workflow:
Description
One implementation has a const and the other doesn't.
BTField.hh line 48
BTFieldConstructor line 68
Look at the const. The function doesn't get overwritten due to the definitional mismatch.
Updated by Tunnell, Christopher over 12 years ago
Same thing here:
not_overridden (Interpolator.hh:44)
bad_override (Interpolator.hh:180)
Updated by Tunnell, Christopher over 12 years ago
And here:
bad_override (BTSheet.cc:127)
not_overridden (BTField.hh:56)
Updated by Tunnell, Christopher over 12 years ago
- Target version changed from MAUS-v0.0.1 to Future MAUS release
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Fixed in r837
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 11 years ago
- Target version changed from Future MAUS release to MAUS-v0.4.1