Bug #1951
LiH Geometry Bug
0%
Description
I did some digging on the LiH geometry...
- Absorber vacuum windows are in place which should not be I think. If they were installed (I guess check with Colin), then use a polycone not the tesselated solid as implemented, to fix the weirdness. The offending geometries are in AFC.gdml as
AlAlloy6061_Element_Step_24
andAlAlloy6061_Element_Step_25
. - The LiH absorber has a ~ 60 mrad misalignment. This seems rather a lot (around 20 mm between one side of the absorber and the other). I rather suspect this is a bug?
Files
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 6 years ago
- File materials.png materials.png added
Note the windows are also on the "empty" geometry
Updated by Rajaram, Durga almost 6 years ago
I agree I doubt they were installed for the lih running.
How about I take those elements out of the LiH & empty-LiH geometries?
And then if Colin says they should be there, do a correct implementation?
& can you post the script you use to make the pretty plot?
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 6 years ago
- File check_geometry.py check_geometry.py added
...attached...
Updated by Rajaram, Durga almost 6 years ago
- File materials-EmptyLiH-10299.png materials-EmptyLiH-10299.png added
- File materials-LiH-10476.png materials-LiH-10476.png added
Took the Al window physical volumes out of the AFC gdml.
I think the misalignment might be stemming from the issue you found earlier with the LH2 geometry where there was a rotation put in.
I have taken that out for the LiH geometries (Nov/Dec 2017 periods)
For the empty LiH, I've left the Mylar foil in there -- not sure if that belongs.
The geometries are in preprod
LiH-Empty:
python bin/utilities/download_geometry.py -geometry_download_run_number 10299 -geometry_download_directory geo-10299 -cdb_download_url "http://preprodcdb.mice.rl.ac.uk/cdb/"
LiH:
python bin/utilities/download_geometry.py -geometry_download_run_number 10476 -geometry_download_directory geo-10476 -cdb_download_url "http://preprodcdb.mice.rl.ac.uk/cdb/"
Will push to prod if you OK it
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 6 years ago
I checked by eye and the geometries look okay to me now - thanks!