Verifying the scifi CDB geometry
I have been looking at the new scifi geometry in the preprod cdb, using run file 07157.000 and MAUS 1.1.0. It be reproduced with:
python bin/utilities/download_geometry.py --cdb_download_url="http://preprodcdb.mice.rl.ac.uk/cdb/" --geometry_download_by="id" --geometry_download_id=671
python bin/analyze_data_offline.py --simulation_geometry_file files/geometry/download/ParentGeometryFile.dat --daq_data_path /home/adobbs/MAUS/data/07157/ --daq_data_file 07157.000
mv maus_output.root maus_output_preprod_07157-000.root
python bin/analyze_data_offline.py --simulation_geometry_file "Stage4.dat" --daq_data_path /home/adobbs/MAUS/data/07157/ --daq_data_file 07157.000
mv maus_output. maus_output_legacy_07157-000.root
I attached some plots for both the legacy and preprod geometry. The only significant difference I can see is in the event viewer position plots. What do people think?
Updated by Dobbs, Adam almost 7 years ago
Strike that. Just re-run the event viewer with the merge branch - legacy and preprod cdb producing pretty much identical event viewer plots. As far as I am concerned I happy for us to pass the preprod geometry, but I would like another set or two of eyes to confirm.