Feature #1600
Analytical form for transfer matrix in transverse coordinates, arbitrary magnetic field
Added by Rogers, Chris about 8 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.
100%
Description
attached...
Files
2014-12-16_13.34.24.jpg (1.09 MB) 2014-12-16_13.34.24.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 16 December 2014 13:41 | ||
2014-12-16_13.34.41.jpg (1.06 MB) 2014-12-16_13.34.41.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 16 December 2014 13:41 | ||
2014-12-16_13.34.51.jpg (1.08 MB) 2014-12-16_13.34.51.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 16 December 2014 13:41 | ||
2014-12-16_13.35.00.jpg (1.08 MB) 2014-12-16_13.35.00.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 16 December 2014 13:41 | ||
2014-12-16_13.37.17.jpg (1.01 MB) 2014-12-16_13.37.17.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 16 December 2014 13:41 | ||
2015-08-27_17.25.44.jpg (1.16 MB) 2015-08-27_17.25.44.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 27 August 2015 17:29 | ||
2015-08-27_17.25.52.jpg (1.12 MB) 2015-08-27_17.25.52.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 27 August 2015 17:29 | ||
2015-08-27_17.26.05.jpg (1.05 MB) 2015-08-27_17.26.05.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 27 August 2015 17:29 | ||
2016-02-25_10.12.27.jpg (1.1 MB) 2016-02-25_10.12.27.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 25 February 2016 10:17 | ||
2016-02-25_11.50.14.jpg (1.04 MB) 2016-02-25_11.50.14.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 25 February 2016 11:53 | ||
2016-02-25_11.50.30.jpg (1.03 MB) 2016-02-25_11.50.30.jpg | Rogers, Chris, 25 February 2016 11:53 |
Updated by Rogers, Chris about 8 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Updated by Rogers, Chris over 7 years ago
- File 2015-08-27_17.25.44.jpg 2015-08-27_17.25.44.jpg added
- File 2015-08-27_17.25.52.jpg 2015-08-27_17.25.52.jpg added
- File 2015-08-27_17.26.05.jpg 2015-08-27_17.26.05.jpg added
Notes on error propagation through fields; these precede the notes above.
Updated by Rogers, Chris over 7 years ago
Note that in "propagation of errors" note number 2:
- (page 1) I have used the Einstein summation notation when I do the Taylor series expansion
- (page 2) D matrix is the matrix with elements
<du_i du_j>
Updated by Rogers, Chris about 7 years ago
I noticed that the 1/pz term for t vs E in 2014-12-16_13.35.00.jpg should be 1/(pz beta^2 gamma ^2). 1/pz is the absolute value, not the derivative.
Updated by Rogers, Chris about 7 years ago
I note I dropped a factor 1/pz in the bottom left hand square of M_d in http://micewww.pp.rl.ac.uk/attachments/3173/2014-12-16_13.35.00.jpg
So elements m_31, m_32, m_41, m_42 (indexing from 1 through 4).
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 7 years ago
- File 2016-02-25_10.12.27.jpg 2016-02-25_10.12.27.jpg added
Also correction to the 0, 1, 2 row in 2016-02-25 10.12.27.jpg
; I am checking everything against numerical derivatives, a few more errors to fix...
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 7 years ago
- File 2016-02-25_11.50.14.jpg 2016-02-25_11.50.14.jpg added
- File 2016-02-25_11.50.30.jpg 2016-02-25_11.50.30.jpg added
Updated equations for px, py