Bug #1278
Potential memory leak when running tracker reconstruction
Added by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.
100%
Description
There appears to be a memory leak when running tracker reconstruction - see #1277
This is visible when running against tracker devel branch.
Files
| process_monitor.py (902 Bytes) process_monitor.py | Rogers, Chris, 23 May 2013 08:47 |
Related issues
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
- took datacards.py attached to #1277.
- adjusted number of spills datacard to 1000 spills
- adjusted tracker_devel uncommenting the tracker recon mappers in
bin/simulate_mice.py# SciFi - # my_map.append(MAUS.MapCppTrackerMCDigitization()) # SciFi electronics model -# my_map.append(MAUS.MapCppTrackerRecon()) # SciFi Recon + my_map.append(MAUS.MapCppTrackerMCDigitization()) # SciFi electronics model + my_map.append(MAUS.MapCppTrackerRecon()) # SciFi Recon - added a small utility to monitor process, output below
- %cpu is percentage of one cpu in use
- %mem is percentage of memory in use
- etime is execution time
Clearly there is a memory leak
26165 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '93.2', 'etime': '00:17'}
26165 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '94.8', 'etime': '00:22'}
26165 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '95.8', 'etime': '00:27'}
26165 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '96.4', 'etime': '00:32'}
26165 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '96.9', 'etime': '00:37'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.0', '%cpu': '97.3', 'etime': '00:42'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.0', '%cpu': '97.6', 'etime': '00:47'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.0', '%cpu': '97.9', 'etime': '00:52'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.0', '%cpu': '98.0', 'etime': '00:57'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.1', '%cpu': '98.2', 'etime': '01:02'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.1', '%cpu': '98.3', 'etime': '01:07'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.1', '%cpu': '98.5', 'etime': '01:12'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.1', '%cpu': '98.6', 'etime': '01:17'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.2', '%cpu': '98.6', 'etime': '01:22'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.2', '%cpu': '98.7', 'etime': '01:27'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.2', '%cpu': '98.8', 'etime': '01:32'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.2', '%cpu': '98.9', 'etime': '01:37'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.3', '%cpu': '98.9', 'etime': '01:42'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.3', '%cpu': '99.0', 'etime': '01:47'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.3', '%cpu': '99.0', 'etime': '01:52'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.3', '%cpu': '99.1', 'etime': '01:57'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.4', '%cpu': '99.1', 'etime': '02:02'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.4', '%cpu': '99.2', 'etime': '02:07'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.4', '%cpu': '99.2', 'etime': '02:12'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.4', '%cpu': '99.2', 'etime': '02:17'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.5', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '02:22'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.5', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '02:27'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.5', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '02:32'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.5', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '02:37'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.6', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '02:42'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.6', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '02:47'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.6', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '02:52'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.6', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '02:57'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.7', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '03:02'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.7', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '03:07'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.7', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '03:12'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.7', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '03:17'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.8', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '03:22'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.8', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '03:27'}
26165 {'%mem': '2.8', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '03:32'}
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
- File process_monitor.py process_monitor.py added
- I reverted
bin/simulate_mice.pyi.e. replaced comments to remove any SciFi reconstruction - process monitor output below
Looks like the memory leak is specific to tracker recon...
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '95.5', 'etime': '00:12'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '96.9', 'etime': '00:17'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '97.6', 'etime': '00:22'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '98.1', 'etime': '00:27'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '98.4', 'etime': '00:32'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '98.7', 'etime': '00:37'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '98.8', 'etime': '00:42'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.0', 'etime': '00:47'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.1', 'etime': '00:52'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.2', 'etime': '00:57'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '01:02'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '01:07'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '01:12'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.4', 'etime': '01:17'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '01:22'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '01:27'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.5', 'etime': '01:32'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.6', 'etime': '01:37'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.6', 'etime': '01:42'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.6', 'etime': '01:47'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '01:52'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '01:57'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '02:02'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '02:07'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '02:12'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '02:17'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:22'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:27'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:32'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:37'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:42'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:47'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:52'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '02:57'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '03:02'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '03:07'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '03:12'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '03:17'}
26361 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '03:22'}
Updated by Santos, Edward almost 10 years ago
Tracker Recon or Json Processors, right? When you add the tracker reconstruction you also add objects to the recon branch which need to be processed.
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
I guess my point is that this is not common to the whole datastructure, only some aspect of tracker implementation (still may be an issue with the framework of course).
I had a look at MapCppTrackerDigitization and found that save_json and read_in_json were calling CppToJson and JsonToCpp, without deleting the allocated memory. Note that the ObjectProcessor does specify that memory allocated by CppToJson and JsonToCpp is owned by the caller, so caller has responsibility to delete the allocated memory.
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
So I pushed a fix to MapCppTrackerMCDigitization
bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chris-rogers/maus/1278/
I now handle the memory properly. Ah, I noticed the unit test is spitting it back (I think my error handling is screwed up in MapCppTrackerMCDigitization::read_in_json)
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
The process monitor returns for 1278
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.3', 'etime': '00:10'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.6', 'etime': '00:15'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.7', 'etime': '00:20'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.8', 'etime': '00:25'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '00:30'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '00:35'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '00:40'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '99.9', 'etime': '00:45'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '00:50'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '00:55'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:00'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:05'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:10'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:15'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:20'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:25'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:30'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:35'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:40'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:45'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:50'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '01:55'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:00'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:05'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:10'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:15'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:20'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:25'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:30'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:35'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:40'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.8', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:45'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:50'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '02:55'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:00'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:05'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:10'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:15'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:20'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:25'}
29276 {'%mem': '1.9', '%cpu': '100', 'etime': '03:30'}
So maybe there is still some problem, but it is certainly much reduced
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
I realise that the way I modified the code, there is still an assignment (=) operator - I don't know if SciFi datastructure has implemented assignment operator to handle assignment correctly. For example, copying cross-references in the same data structure needs to be handled very carefully to maintain the integrity of the data.
Updated by Santos, Edward almost 10 years ago
The assignment should work correctly, I'll give this a spin and let you know. Just need to finish off the changes in the clustering/mice module handling first.
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
Note I pushed another revision - bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chris-rogers/maus/1278/ now passes all of the unit tests that the tracker_devel branch passed. (There were a couple of fails in the revision I picked up).
Adam, do you want me to do the same thing to MapCppTrackerRecon? Or would you rather tackle that one?
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
- Assignee changed from Rogers, Chris to Santos, Edward
Hand-off to Ed (or should it be Adam?) to do the other tracker modules.
Updated by Santos, Edward almost 10 years ago
Fixed by revision 979 of tracker_devel.Thanks, Chris.
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Updated by Rogers, Chris almost 10 years ago
- Target version changed from Future MAUS release to MAUS-v0.5.4