# 2016-09-15-emittance¶

14:00 Thursday 15th September

http://mice.iit.edu/phonebridge.html

Scott/Durga:- Estimate of the systematic error associated with rate-dependence in TOF?
- Source of bias and the "100 ps" affect

- What dos the p-value distribution look like? Are the p-values not uniform if not, why not?
- What is the error on tracker recon introduced by the field non-uniformity?
- What is the error on tracker recon introduced by the disagreement between model and field maps cf: slide 3 of

https://indico.cern.ch/event/485764/contribution/2005672/attachments/1249829/1842249/fieldmapping.pdf

- What is the source of disagreement between TOF and tracker?
- What is the material budget between TOF and tracker? Is it correct? (See Francois also)
- What is the solenoid alignment like

- Further analysis of discrepancy between the Hall probes and OPERA?
- Continue trying to untangle the field mapping data for SSU

- Can the agreement between MC and data be improved? Dipole fiddling?
- At what statistical significance do MC and data disagree?
- What are the systematic errors (e.g. from quad/dipole/solenoid settings, incorrect material model etc)?

- Decoupled/2D emittance calculation?
- Diffuser scraping effect vs extrapolated tracks?